Best xml editor for windows
The problem is that there are features that text-editors don't tend to provide, that are critical. Most, if not all, don't understand documents that are not XML (or something related, like HTML or SGML).Īn obvious way around this problem would be to use a standard text editor with some XML plug-ins. Then the better editors to betray their SGML roots (focus on document structure over ease of editing). They also tend to first invoke DOS processes.).
BEST XML EDITOR FOR WINDOWS WINDOWS
(Many current editors, for instance, cannot handle path names, even on Windows 98/NT, that include word spaces. I am not sure why this is necessary, but it is the current practice. Many are written in Java, which leads to some interesting, slow, and non-standard interface behaviors. It must be easy to install, easy to maintain, and misfunction on the rarest of occasions.Īt this time, XML editors do not tend to meet these criteria. Ideally, the tool should be extensible, although what this means is also up for discussion.Īnd, finally, the tool must be robust. The ability to edit tables may come to matter very much. In other words, we want to not only edit documents, but edit the meta documents that describe how our documents work.īecause much XML editorial matter may be stored in a relational database, it is usually important that the tool make such queries easy. We also need a tool for creating, changing, and validating DTDs (the files that define XML document structure) and XSL (a method of merging XML calls with presentation information) documents. In addition, the following are often important: If the tool can accommodate at least some types of external entities, such as images, all the better.
It must allow the creation and/or editing of well-formed XML documents sans DTD. It must be able to switch, update, or add DTDs later. It must validate the results and make it easy to find errors.
It must show the editor relevant tags and make tagging easy The tool must be able to open up multiple documentsįind/Replace, including global, search a directory find/replace In the end, this was the minimal, "this is what we really need": I have gone through several sets of criteria in reviewing software. (If you browse a bit, you'll also see some fuzzy categories on the site, which accurately reflect the current state of art.) Some criteria are described in this ZD Net overview: įor a quick overview of most available XML editors, see
The term, "XML editor" can refer to a great many types of tools, depending on the purpose to which the editor is to be put.
BEST XML EDITOR FOR WINDOWS ARCHIVE
National digital archive based at six different UK universities. The Arts and Humanities Data Service is, amongst many other functions, a It also presents the results of an evaluation exercise where different user It looks at 23 different editors and benchmarks them against variousįeatures (eg, Multilingual text input and display, Support for different
In the meantime, I got the following e-mail from the UK, and even though this new evaluation doesn't include my own preferred tool, it is current and covers a lot of good ground: he article is atĪhds.ac.uk/creating/information-papers/xml-editors/ In this case, the error appears to be Oxygen's. I recently took Oxygen for a test drive, but it is horridly slow, and found an error in a schema that I was testing. I continue to use XML Spy and its pieces when I do XML editing and have not found anything to compare. Note, : I have not had time to re-evaluate this subject in over five years (although I have thought about it a lot) and don't see that time coming soon. Let me know if I can make your comments part of this page. If you have observations to add, please send me e-mail. XML Editors: Allegations of Functionality in search of reality